|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 13:12:36 GMT -5
Listen to Alex Jones Radio show. He has Larry Pratt from Gun Owners of America. www.infowars.com/ Go to the top right side of the page and click "Listen Now".
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 13:20:29 GMT -5
These students should have been clutching guns instead of cell phones. Some mindless idiots will see this as a louder calling for gun control. Gun control did not work for these guys. The school implemented gun controls after a shooting incident a year or so ago. Go to Gun Owners of America and read the firearms fact sheet www.gunowners.org/skeptic.htmNEVER TURN IN YOUR FIREARMS!!!!.............................or you might be a victim too. Brian Solomon John 6:68
|
|
|
Post by espy on Apr 16, 2007 14:06:28 GMT -5
The only thing a shooter likes better than killing is not having his victims shoot back in defence.
Gun control will only benifit the criminals and make more innocent victims.
Ban or no ban I will always be packin'.
|
|
|
Post by killer on Apr 16, 2007 14:11:31 GMT -5
Any word on shooter's identity and/or reason for this?
|
|
|
Post by lawman on Apr 16, 2007 14:17:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 14:40:16 GMT -5
Any word on shooter's identity and/or reason for this? I heard it was an Asian / American. I don't know about a motive.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 14:44:12 GMT -5
Any word on shooter's identity and/or reason for this? I heard it was an Asian / American. I don't know about a motive. I'm gonna guess that the first student killed in the dorm this morning was a female? This is only a guess...
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 14:49:05 GMT -5
Everyone make sure you call 101.1 and promote the 2nd amendment. Don't let the gun control nuts claim this one. Gun control got those people killed. They were not allowed to have weapons and on top of that they were locked down after the shootings started. Some of the shootings were possibly 2 HOURS APART!!!
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Apr 16, 2007 16:03:13 GMT -5
While not being a proponent of gun control, I wouldn't be honest if I didn't have reservations about no restrictions. I guess I wonder how many murders would occur with more people having guns on their hips in today's society versus the amount that would be prevented in relation to events such as this.
I think it is something valid to consider. Hell, look at today's society...we have parents getting mad at little league games and attacking coaches and children....this sort of stuff has definitely increased by any measure and it makes me wonder about the average joe having a glock on him.
At least with the current restrictions, you have to go through some processing in order to be able to carry a concealed weapon.
As in this event, I would also have to contradict my premise above, in a way and state that what is the percentage of people that do commit crimes or go wacko, that DO have a permit to carry a concealed gun. My impression is very low because I don't recall ever hearing of a rampage by somebody using a pistol that they had a permit to carry.
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 16:31:42 GMT -5
I just called in and pissed on Murphy's neocon candidates: Rudy and McCain. Rudy is pro fag, pro baby killing, anti self defense and he was partly responsible for demolishing the crime scene at ground zero. Many of NYFD and NYPD hate his guts. McCain is rabidly anti gun and anti free speech. www.gunowners.org/mccaintb.htmThe neocon lap dogs at 101.1 hate cold hard facts. I told Matt I would not vote for Rudy or McCain and he stated my only other choice was Hilary of Obama. I replied Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter were good guys in the Republican party. I advised him this is possibly when Tancredo would cave in to gun grabbers like he did when Columbine went down. Matt shouted me down 2 or 3 times. Go see how the 2008 candidates measure up on the 2nd amendment. gunowners.org/pres08/Look at the constitution Party www.constitutionparty.com/Conservative Exodus Project: Conservatives are leaving the Republican Party join us. If they give the nomination to some neocon liberal watered down republican vote for the Constitution Party Candidate. They are the 3rd largest party and are rapidly growing. www.conservativeexodusproject.com/101.1 is a fraud!!! Watch them!! They will go on promoting Rudy or McCain. The constitution part could gain 20 million members over night and 101.1 would not beat the drum for them. They claim that Crawford Radio is a "God and Country" station but Matt demonized the Constitution Party as "Biblicists" like that is another form of terrorism or something.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Apr 16, 2007 16:35:12 GMT -5
"Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum would not say how many weapons the gunman carried. But a law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation was incomplete, said that the gunman had two pistols and multiple clips of ammunition."
The obvious focus on gun control will be levied at pistols this time. Will be curious to find out if these were the gunman's pistols or not.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Apr 16, 2007 16:36:41 GMT -5
matt is guilty of helping EVIL to win.....he and many others cant grasp that there is NO REAL difference between mccain guliani hillary or obama, they ALL support bigger government more taxes LESS FREEDOM and total control over citizens.
voting for the "lesser" of 2 evils is still a vote FOR EVIL!
those that support either demos or repubs are voting AGAINST the US constitution....and actively working AGAINST real patriots that love this once great nation!
those that trust government are FOOLS and show NO knowledge of history!
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 16:48:31 GMT -5
Everybody write down your thoughts against 101.1 and call in!!! Now is a good time to pound their heads. Listeners are all ears to this fake conservative station and need to hear some truth. Don't let this oppurtinity fall! Take it to them!!!
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 17:00:47 GMT -5
Matt is a neocon slob.
I think 101.1 is a diversion station to lure away conservatives and immobilize them. They are left to rally against pay raises and to over look the open borders, 9/11 cover up, Gun Control, foreign policy, United Nations and the other weightier matters.
They are fakes!
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 17:01:06 GMT -5
While not a Rudy fan myself for a miltitude of reasons, I would hesitate to say that wanting equality for everyone makes a person "pro fag." I told Matt I would not vote for Rudy or McCain and he stated my only other choice was Hilary of Obama. I replied Ron Paul, Duncan Hunter were good guys in the Republican party. I agree that Matt needs to get off of his lesser of two evils bit. As long as Americans uphold the two party system, the Republicans are free to be as evil as they wish as long as they remain just a smidgen less evil that the other party. As Rove said, "Where else are they (conservatives) gonna go?" If the Republicans get a split vote because more true conservatives vote for a third party, then perhaps they'll eventually learn their lesson.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Apr 16, 2007 17:01:15 GMT -5
no desire to make a call, bear bryant said it is very dumb to argue with people that buy ink by the 55 gallon drum.....you CANT win debate when your opponent controls the microphone.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 17:04:03 GMT -5
I wouldn't call him a neocon. Although he does surprise me sometimes with his tendency to lean left on a few issues. He came out of left field a minute ago when he supported Rudy's stance on the NYC gun ban. I can't ever support any infringement upon gun ownership by law abiding citizens, even if the crime rate does go down. It's a dangerous path that will make the citizenry weaker against unjust government force.
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 17:04:45 GMT -5
While not a Rudy fan myself for a miltitude of reasons, I would hesitate to say that wanting equality for everyone makes a person "pro fag." Fags already have rights. What they are getting now are special privileges.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 17:11:33 GMT -5
Fags already have rights. What they are getting now are special privileges. Do they actually have special privileges that the rest of us do not?
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 17:33:36 GMT -5
They have the right to live, work, freedom of speech, right to keep and bear arms, due process, the right to promote their filth, make the rest of us sick with their filth and many other things. What "rights" do they lack? anything else sounds like special rights.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 17:43:27 GMT -5
They have the right to live, work, freedom of speech, right to keep and bear arms, due process... 14th Amendment - U.S. Constitution No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.But Brian, do you want a country where people's personal beliefs render them any less free? Where would the restrictions upon liberty stop? If we're going to restrict the freedom of gays, why not atheists or Muslims or anyone else that's different?
|
|
|
Post by espy on Apr 16, 2007 18:11:17 GMT -5
Athiesm and muslim faith are just that faiths, beliefs. FAGS are an abomination to everything we hold to be natural. It is unnatural to want to have sex with someones poop chute, or for a woman to want to pretend to be a man with a strap on and have sex with a woman..........sickness......they will all get to have their sick pleasures in hell unless they turn from this sickness.
I think homosexuals, child predators, and anyone with perverse sexual habits should have their own state where they can leave we normal people alone. and by normal I mean EVERYONE else.
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 18:23:55 GMT -5
Talibama.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Apr 16, 2007 18:28:02 GMT -5
some people see trying to force one beliefs on others as an abomination when it comes to taking away basic freedom.
and passing LAWS to restrict others based on YOUR faith is by definition forcing your views on everyone.
the sunday blue laws are a perfect example.
|
|
|
Post by espy on Apr 16, 2007 18:34:42 GMT -5
I am for everyone having individual rights, but as far as sexual perversion, they can all go to hell. I, as a Christian, love these people as lost souls but me as a person am tired of hearing all their crap,"we want this, we want that" If they would keep their sexuality under wraps like the rest of us, they might get treated like a normal person. But they all have to wear their sexuality on their shirts and try to ram their sick lifestyle down everyones throats. And then they want to try to get special treatment for it........
They do have special rights, they get to have their sick little parades, while wearing next to nothing, groping each other and in some cases having public sex in these parades.......too bad the Taliban dont send a suicide bomber in the middle of one of those things.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Apr 16, 2007 18:37:54 GMT -5
Jesus made me reconsider my reply.....none needed
|
|
|
Post by epsy on Apr 16, 2007 18:53:54 GMT -5
And speaking of rights, before anyone says anything negative towards my post. I have the right to Hate the lifestyle.......
|
|
|
Post by brandon on Apr 16, 2007 19:11:42 GMT -5
as a person am tired of hearing all their crap,"we want this, we want that" If they would keep their sexuality under wraps like the rest of us, they might get treated like a normal person. You mean that heterosexuals want to keep everything under wraps such as getting married to the one they love? Don't heterosexuals get married? Isn't that wearing their sexuality on their sleeves?
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Apr 16, 2007 19:21:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hobbs on Apr 16, 2007 19:25:19 GMT -5
Don't you guys realize that you have a choice in what you listen to on the radio???
This is what (I believe) got Dale and I canned. People didn't know how to turn the dial if they didn't like what they heard. Instead you advocate making lists about what you don't like about the station. TURN THE DAMN DIAL. The different show hosts are allowed to voice their opinions and handle their shows any way they want (as long as they comply with the FCC and management). If you don't like what you hear, either call in a debate, or go elsewhere. Don't make lists. Don't call and complain. Look around and I'm sure you'll find a talk show host who you fit more in line with. Matt, Lee and whoever else don't need to tailor their shows to cater to you. That's the beauty of talk radio.
|
|