|
Post by blondie on Feb 17, 2007 15:23:03 GMT -5
I love the fact that Russ and Dee were replaced by a much better show.
And even though it was uncalled for, I love the way they were so ruthlessly canned without the prior notice or graceful exit one would expect from any decent corporation.
Their nasty condescension might have been their own ruin. For instance, any productive dialog about illegal immigration was stopped in its tracks by the Fines. Reasonable people in Birmingham who saw a problem dared not vocalize their opinions. They were afraid of being associated with the naked racism of Russ and Dee.
Hopefully the profits from an intelligent show like the Attack Machine will cloud Crawford Broadcastings desire to proselytize their creepy cult.
|
|
|
Post by richbrout on Feb 17, 2007 15:55:31 GMT -5
I totally agree with you.
I wish the "Crawford Stand" would go the way of Russ and Dee.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 15:59:02 GMT -5
richbrout -
It is a private company. You can easily make the crawford stand go away by turning the dial. It only lasts about a minute. I am positive that the type of people that want to listen to the Crawford Stand have to tolerate a lot more that is offensive to them daily, than the ones that don't.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 16:03:53 GMT -5
i know what Jesus would say about the crawfoprd stand....listen NOT to the pharisees, for they seek earthly rewards among men....the path to the Father is private and should be walked in solitude!
God desires a personal one on one relationship with each person, NOT the huge public displays of false "faith".
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 16:13:17 GMT -5
billt,
Who do you think you are that you can state that crawford broadcasting is not within their rights, religious or otherwise to spend their money to make comments through the lens of his religion? God does desire a one on one relationship and part of the way that is accomplished is through the means that he prescribed. Did Jesus say to the disciples to go out and preach the Gospel to all men or did he say hide away in solice and be quiet?
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 16:17:32 GMT -5
corny you cant be as stupid as your posts indicate.....NOWHERE did i remotely imply that crawford doesnt have a right to do what they do...BUT as is the norm for YOU, LIE about what i have posted then shoot down a claim i never made.
corny you are earning a new name, corny, worlds greatest strawman builder!
|
|
|
Post by richbrout on Feb 17, 2007 16:27:20 GMT -5
I was merely stating my preference.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 16:30:00 GMT -5
billt - Your implication was by comparing the crawford stand to the pharisees, in relation to Matthew 6:2, Matthew 6:5 and Matthew 6:16. You then go on to state that the "path" to God should be private and by implication not public. You then directly accuse the crawford stand as being pharisaic in the manner of a false public display of faith. You say you know what Jesus would say about the crawford stand...I say you don't have a clue and are as stupid as your posts indicate. My statements were correct.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 16:32:58 GMT -5
I was merely stating my preference. Fair enough...I perhaps was blinded by the remaining dirt from blondie's post still hovering around.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 17:00:14 GMT -5
corny, NONE of what you posted has anything to do with the false claim you made that i didnt think crawford has a "right" to do that.
they clearly have a right to buy a radio station and program it as they see fit within the broad FCC guidelines of serving the community interest.
and I have a right to say they are making a very public DISPLAY of their faith, intended to be heard by man here on earth and seeking to make a profit with their display clearly seeking earthly rewards.
that is in FACT the point of the scripture you cited.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 17:17:52 GMT -5
billt -
I am not going to play the semantics game with you. You clearly implied and directly stated that the crawford stand was a display of false faith. Your omission of statement contrary to the first two posts would logically conclude that you don't think it should be on the air.
Hence my statement that who are you to judge whether or not their pubic display is appropriate or not and to imply that they don't have a religious right...an obligation to preach the messages of Jesus, being it is in their ability to do so.
You have no reasonable information to point the scripture I cited as being applied in the crawford stand. The fact that they are a buisness does not automatically prohibit them from making public statements in a religious manner, without having the automatic disparagement of being a display of false faith.
If you think the crawford stand is a public display of false faith, then should should back up your inditement. Put up or shut up.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 17:24:20 GMT -5
take it up with Jesus corny that is where my opinion about public displays is based....
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 17:28:00 GMT -5
take it up with Jesus corny that is where my opinion about public displays is based.... Thanks for clarifying what you tried to obfuscate.
|
|
|
Post by blondie on Feb 17, 2007 17:29:52 GMT -5
billt,
Is phinehas cornbread?
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 17:31:12 GMT -5
billt, Is phinehas cornbread? I'll answer a question about myself. Cornbread was a forum name I used in the Murphy forum. billt calls me corny to show me his disrespect for me.
|
|
|
Post by blondie on Feb 17, 2007 17:32:43 GMT -5
That's cool.
The same cornbread that calls Matt once and awhile?
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 17:34:00 GMT -5
That's cool. The same cornbread that calls Matt once and awhile? No.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 17:44:00 GMT -5
in the interest of honesty, i call corny that because he chose the name cornbread for himself and many of his posts to me are indeed "corny" meaning inane having nothing to do with what i posted.
as above please notice that things he claims in my post are always "by omission" (meaning i did NOT post it but corny ADDED his twist), "left unsaid"(same meaning) "omission os statement contrary"(means you didnt say this but I want what you said to mean this).
an example of the last one..."i say during a cloudless day the sun warms and lights the earth", corny responds, billt are you stupid? it gets dark at night.
according to corny by "omission of contrary statement" I meant it stays daylight 24 hours a day when cloudless.
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 17:54:45 GMT -5
in the interest of honesty, i call corny that because he chose the name cornbread for himself and many of his posts to me are indeed "corny" meaning inane having nothing to do with what i posted. as above please notice that things he claims in my post are always "by omission" (meaning i did NOT post it but corny ADDED his twist), "left unsaid"(same meaning) "omission os statement contrary"(means you didnt say this but I want what you said to mean this). an example of the last one..."i say during a cloudless day the sun warms and lights the earth", corny responds, billt are you stupid? it gets dark at night. according to corny by "omission of contrary statement" I meant it stays daylight 24 hours a day when cloudless. So, would you like me to call you by what I think your posts represent? That's why I point out that it is not a mature thing to do. You continue to do it, which speaks volumes. I can find plenty of posts were I don't point out an ommission on your part, in fact the vast majority of things I refute from your posts are what you directly say. You do have a habit of being vague in key places of your posts in order to then come back later and say you meant such and such and therefore the person is a liar. Like the above posts show. Edit: You could at least get your definition of "corny" right in your continued disrespect. Which again, using your defintion of a liar, shows you to be a liar. "many of his posts to me are indeed "corny" meaning inane having nothing to do with what i posted." Websters: corny 3 : mawkishly old-fashioned : tiresomely simple and sentimental <told corny jokes>
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 17, 2007 18:13:39 GMT -5
corny, thank you for the opportunity to clarify.
i find your INANE(not pertaining to anything i posted) posts to be "tiresomely simple", or as YOUR post indicates "corny".
the fact that they are inane makes them corny!
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 20:41:09 GMT -5
billt, you and others that feel that way about my posts can simply ignore them and not respond. Anything less will disprove your premise. It was a joy responding to your posts and viewing your inept attempts to counter mine.
|
|
|
Post by lawman on Feb 17, 2007 21:16:29 GMT -5
Posted by phinehas on Today at 7:41pm ''billt, you and others that feel that way about my posts can simply ignore them and not respond. Anything less will disprove your premise. It was a joy responding to your posts and viewing your inept attempts to counter mine.''
Great job of being a Christian (what a joker) example for the lost and sinful.............Speaking of sinful.......
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 17, 2007 21:32:23 GMT -5
Posted by phinehas on Today at 7:41pm ''billt, you and others that feel that way about my posts can simply ignore them and not respond. Anything less will disprove your premise. It was a joy responding to your posts and viewing your inept attempts to counter mine.'' Great job of being a Christian (what a joker) example for the lost and sinful.............Speaking of sinful....... I have consistently defended Christianity and Christians on forums where you have consistently done the opposite. I am a sinner and so are you.
|
|
|
Post by killer on Feb 17, 2007 21:44:01 GMT -5
Somebody's been watching Jimmy Swaggart.
|
|
|
Post by dixiepixie on Feb 18, 2007 2:56:29 GMT -5
Somebody's been watching Jimmy Swaggart. Is he still on the air? If I am following him correctly, phin is refering to the fact that the Bible states ALL have sinned and ALL fall short of the glory of God. Christians aren't perfect, just forgiven. I don't know about phin, but I struggle and fight temptation every day. Sometimes the temptation wins, some times I win.
|
|
|
Post by deovindice on Feb 19, 2007 13:57:29 GMT -5
Wonderful. Another thread turned into a bitch-session exchange between billt and phinehas.
You guys are too intelligent for this.
As to the Russ and Dee topic, I miss the show. I still correspond with them several times a week, but I miss them on the air. I realize that Dee was very opinionated and inflexible, but that was a good counter to Russ, who was more objective and capable of changing his mind, which I heard many times during a broadcast.
The Attack Machine is a decent replacement, but it's not as good. The Source basically sucks anymore. I only listen intermittently these days.
|
|
|
Post by dixiepixie on Feb 19, 2007 14:02:13 GMT -5
I had gotten to the point where I couldn't stand the sound of Dee's voice. If Russ had been given a new partner, or gone it alone, it would have been a great show. That hour that Dee had on her own was PAINFUL. I miss Russ, but I am happy to live without Dee.
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 19, 2007 14:06:30 GMT -5
i agree 100% and that is why i have almost decided to stop posting here as i did on the matt forum months ago.
corny has an agenda with me and wont allow me to post about issues, he will attack me and divert every thread i post in to the personal BS.
before i made my first post here i emailed "am producer" to explain what happened in the past and prediciting it would happen here.
my first post here was responded to by corny and ever since the same INANE BS happens.
i would LOVE to discuss issues and have much to share, BUT those with an agenda dont allow that to happen.
anyone that reads the threads will clearly see that I am posting about issues, BUT after being attacked on a personal level, i get frustrated and do respond.
you are correct i am far too intelligent to allow that BUT being human cant help myself at times.
the best course of action for me is to stop posting here, read as i desire and let the children "play".
|
|
|
Post by phinehas on Feb 19, 2007 14:54:02 GMT -5
billt You give at least as much as you take. Everybody is ignorant or a liar to you and you are constantly telling that to people. I could give a flip whether you post or not...if you want to blame me for why you are a quitter, then so be it. You are the most immature old person I have ever come across. For a person with an inordinate amout of self pride, you sure are a wuss. Oh and here is a REAL dictionary for you to use to find out the original meaning of words before they became twisted. Like what "Lie" and "Liar" mean.... www.cbtministries.org/resources/webster1828.htm
|
|
|
Post by billt on Feb 19, 2007 15:35:43 GMT -5
from the link
"LIE, n.
1. A criminal falsehood; a falsehood uttered for the purpose of deception; an intentional violation of truth. Fiction, or a false statement or representation, not intended to deceive, mislead or injure, as in fables, parables and the like, is not a lie.
It is willful deceit that makes a lie. A man may act a lie, as by pointing his finger in a wrong direction, when a traveler inquires of him his road.
2. A fiction; in a ludicrous sense.
3. False doctrine. 1John 2.
4. An idolatrous picture of God, or a false god. Romans 1.
5. That which deceives and disappoints confidence."
from ABOVE
"Everybody is ignorant or a liar to you and you are constantly telling that to people."
since there are MANY poster here that i havent even posted a comment to and MOST people here i have NEVER made a comment about, the above statement by corny is KNOWN to be false, it is intended to deceive, and esily shown to be so as just done.
even by your own definition corny you remain a LIAR!
as to me being a "wuss" as mentioned a few times, YOU lack the courage to come say the things you post here to my face.
that is NOT a physical threat by the way, just confirming that I can be found any wednesday night at vestavia bowl, and the gutless PUNK clearly doing everything they can to provoke is really just a keyboard commando.
|
|