|
Post by lawman on May 29, 2007 16:39:24 GMT -5
Wit, truth, a sharp tongue and beauty as well. We on the Right are truly blessed. And the right has...Rosie and Mother Sheehan! Are you SURE you folks aren't for abstinence-only training? An evil, two-legged Pit bull, Mic-hell-e.....you're blessed with like-kind to equal the demons that 'drive you people!'
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 29, 2007 16:45:01 GMT -5
If Hell's demons look like Michelle, no wonder Democrats are so consumed with doing things that would result in God sending them there.
Who says that Republicans have to be polite when responding to the provocations of Democrats? Who wrote that rule?
|
|
|
Post by fragerella on May 29, 2007 17:11:54 GMT -5
OMG...I'm laughing my arse off at this entire thread!
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 29, 2007 19:14:58 GMT -5
When I see Michelle Malkin, my "Inner Self" comes out:
|
|
|
Post by kevin on May 29, 2007 19:52:22 GMT -5
I'm missing it...how was this more obnoxious than Rosie?
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 29, 2007 20:24:03 GMT -5
kevin-
Easy answer.
Lawman >AGREES< with Rosie and >DISAGREES< with Michelle.
Disagreement equal obnoxious.
At least in LawWorld.
Y'know...I should probably watch myself around law.
He's packing a 9m, y'know.
|
|
|
Post by kevin on May 29, 2007 20:28:09 GMT -5
Is a 9m as deadly as a butt canon?
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 29, 2007 20:39:21 GMT -5
Is a 9m as deadly as a butt canon? Some questions are better left unanswered.
|
|
|
Post by Twista on May 29, 2007 22:05:20 GMT -5
"He's packing a 9m, y'know. "
Whew, he must have to stand OUTSIDE the bathroom door when he goes to pee...
"Lawng Dong Silver"!
(remember him? hmm... LOL)
|
|
lawman
Apprentice Cog
Posts: 237
|
Post by lawman on May 29, 2007 22:36:52 GMT -5
Is a 9m as deadly as a butt canon? Some questions are better left unanswered. Spoken like a well experienced, much traveled 'shill'....
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 30, 2007 13:32:20 GMT -5
Coming from a popinjay like yourself, 'tis taken with a rather large grain of salt.
|
|
|
Post by lawman on May 30, 2007 13:40:01 GMT -5
''Popin'' indeed.....I ain't no paid shill just an 'average joe' --- But, well traveled also!
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 30, 2007 15:31:30 GMT -5
You mean I'm supposed to get paid for telling the truth?
And all along I've been doing it as a public service- missionary work among the heathens if you will.
|
|
|
Post by solomon on May 30, 2007 17:53:33 GMT -5
Missionaries are supported by local churches WOMI. So are you admitting you receive support to make comments on this forum? $$$$$$$$ I see you have around 1,129 posts on your cog info.
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on May 30, 2007 19:52:13 GMT -5
While donations are always nice, setting the record straight by correcting the lies, distortions, misinformation and disinformation is reward enough.
I do what I do because I care about the system.
And I enjoy a good intellectual joust now and then, such as I have with several folks here (including blondie!). The day you stop learing or wanting to learn is the day you die and intellectual death.
|
|
|
Post by Twista on May 31, 2007 1:37:38 GMT -5
So anyway, I've never heard or seen this Malkin lady, other than the pictures on this thread... Is she an expert (or have some other qualifications) that would make me think what she tells me is what I should believe, and make into my own opinion? Or is she just a flavor of the month commentator that the media outlet moulded into a spokesperson for their positions? What would make me feel compelled to want to listen to her?
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on Jun 1, 2007 18:17:23 GMT -5
Sayeth Wikipedia: Career
She began her career at the Los Angeles Daily News, working as a columnist from 1992 to 1994. In 1996, she moved to Seattle, Washington, where she wrote columns for The Seattle Times. She became a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate in 1999. She is also a frequent commentator for FOX News Channel and has guest-hosted The O'Reilly Factor.
In June 2004 she launched a political blog which quickly became popular, at most times residing among the top five conservative political blogs.[3] After initially allowing reader comments, she disabled them, attributing her decision to an intolerable level of obscene and racist comments.[4]
Malkin's blog occasionally highlights investigative reports from other sites, most notably an investigation into financial irregularities at Air America Radio.[5] She is frequently used as an example of the blurred line between bloggers and reporters, given such investigations and her widely distributed columns and appearances on multiple media outlets.
Her first book, Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces, was published in 2002 and was a New York Times bestseller.
In 2004, she wrote In Defense of Internment, defending Japanese American internment by the United States Government during World War II and relating this theme to the contemporary "War on Terrorism", taking some heat from Asian American civil rights organizations who had been uniformly opposed to this historical policy. The "Historians' Committee for Fairness", a group of professors, condemned the book for not having undergone peer review and argued that its central thesis is false.[6] An attempt to ban the book from the Manzanar relocation center National Historic Site failed.[7]
Malkin's third book, Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild was released in October 2005.
[edit] Hot Air website On April 24, 2006, Hot Air, a "conservative Internet broadcast network" went into operation, with Malkin as founder and CEO.[8] Other staffers include "Allahpundit" and Bryan Preston. Malkin has a daily video "column" on Hot Air called "Vent With Michelle Malkin."
After Hot Air's first year of operation, Malkin wrote:[9]
[T]hanks to all of you for making the first year of Hot Air a phenomenal success. ... One of the primary goals in starting this site was to give you content and analysis you can’t get anywhere else on a daily basis–both on the blog and in our original video features. Another chief goal: having fun.
After Malkin criticized hip hop artist Akon for "degrading women" in a Vent episode, Akon's record label, Universal Music Group, forced YouTube to remove the video by issuing a DMCA takedown notice[10] but backed down[11] after the Electronic Frontier Foundation joined Malkin and Hot Air in contesting the removal as a misuse of copyright law.[12] My opinion: it isn't necessarily that she brings her own insightfulness to the conversation, at least not on a regular basis, but more that she spends a great deal of time doing the sort of investigative research that allows her opinion to be unusually informed. Plus she's REAL easy on the eyes....
|
|