|
Post by dixiepixie on Feb 7, 2007 11:20:03 GMT -5
wcco.com/national/topstories_story_037132038.htmlALBANY, Ore. An Oregon father used a 100,000-volt stun gun on his 18-month-old son, police said Monday. Rian Whittman, 23, has been accused of assault and criminal mistreatment. Police said he used it "multiple times" over three weeks. A police spokesman said there were up to 10 instances. Police said Whittman's wife, 21, who was not named, reported the abuse on Saturday. The child was treated at a hospital, police said, and then taken into protective custody by the state Department of Human Services. Capt. Eric Carter said the police haven't established a motive for the abuse, nor why it began about three weeks ago. He said the device was not a Taser weapon, named for the manufacturer, but an older model that's applied directly to someone's skin. What the hell was this idiot thinking? Why would anyone SHOCK an 18 month old baby? Someone should strip him naked soak him down & shock his male parts over and over again for a few weeks.
|
|
|
Post by killer on Feb 7, 2007 11:35:02 GMT -5
Not everyone should be allowed to breed.
Saw on news where man tried to poison his children so he could sue Campbell's Soup Co.
I'm thinking "What Idiots!"
The stories of terrible parents are endless.
|
|
|
Post by dixiepixie on Feb 7, 2007 11:40:25 GMT -5
I cringe when I see things like this in the news. I saw one a few weeks ago about a man who shot his 12 week old baby with a BB gun over 20 times, and claimed it was an accident.
|
|
|
Post by firestud2829 on Feb 7, 2007 19:01:58 GMT -5
I cringe when I see things like this in the news. I saw one a few weeks ago about a man who shot his 12 week old baby with a BB gun over 20 times, and claimed it was an accident. Yeah, accident...if he was having a f*cking seizure.
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on Feb 17, 2007 22:57:14 GMT -5
Sort of a related story...
I think it's out in Washington state that a gay group is gathering signatures to place on an upcoming election ballot a state law that says heterosexuals must have a child within three years of the date of their marriage or have the State annul their marriage, on the grounds that heterosexual marriage that does not procreate should have no more legal standing than a homosexual marraige that does not procreate.
|
|
|
Post by Twista on Feb 18, 2007 2:51:20 GMT -5
Sort of a related story... I think it's out in Washington state that a gay group is gathering signatures to place on an upcoming election ballot a state law that says heterosexuals must have a child within three years of the date of their marriage or have the State annul their marriage, on the grounds that heterosexual marriage that does not procreate should have no more legal standing than a homosexual marraige that does not procreate. Whoa... Cool! (Honey, It's just as big a bother for me as it is for you, but we "have" to make love again tonite... It's the Law!) LOL
|
|
|
Post by W.O.M.I on Feb 18, 2007 15:05:55 GMT -5
Leave it to twista to find the silver lining on this particular dark cloud... ;D
|
|
|
Post by richbrout on Feb 18, 2007 18:08:09 GMT -5
Agreed.............Which leads me BACK to "Jesus Camp"
|
|
|
Post by mamawolf on Feb 28, 2007 7:40:36 GMT -5
Sort of a related story... I think it's out in Washington state that a gay group is gathering signatures to place on an upcoming election ballot a state law that says heterosexuals must have a child within three years of the date of their marriage or have the State annul their marriage, on the grounds that heterosexual marriage that does not procreate should have no more legal standing than a homosexual marraige that does not procreate. That is just plain ASSININE and that is what makes people come down so hard on gays when they state something so stupid. Every human being can't have children and they know this. Got a friend right now wanting a child so bad they can't stand it.....been married 2 years, spent WELL OVER 10k on fertility therapy and she is just not able to get pregnant. Gay people that stand up for stuff like that law are just spiteful idiots.
|
|
|
Post by solinvictus on Feb 28, 2007 23:00:39 GMT -5
I agree, but I also support eugenics and sterilization of the mentally unfit. Society shouldn't foot the bill for irresponsible breeding.
|
|
|
Post by clinthall on Mar 2, 2007 14:24:42 GMT -5
Hey, listen, when you're looking to bulk-purchase some brown shirts, I know a vendor for you . . . .
|
|
|
Post by solinvictus on Mar 2, 2007 19:00:41 GMT -5
Hey, listen, when you're looking to bulk-purchase some brown shirts, I know a vendor for you . . . . ... that society should foot the bill to breed retards? You're more generous than I. You do realize that Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a supporter of eugenics.
|
|
|
Post by clinthall on Mar 2, 2007 23:44:36 GMT -5
I don't think Klan-sympathizing racists with totalitarian ambitions should be allowed to breed, either. Society shouldn't be burdened with generations of David Duke types.
|
|
|
Post by solinvictus on Mar 7, 2007 19:16:52 GMT -5
I don't think Klan-sympathizing racists with totalitarian ambitions should be allowed to breed, either. Society shouldn't be burdened with generations of David Duke types. The Klan? Those sheet-wearing, Pabst swilling inbreds? Geez, give me more credit than that! They couldn't pronounce the word "eugenics". Totalitarian ambitions? In some ways, I guess, but just long enough to take a surgeon's scalpel to this sick society and cut out some tumors. Regarding totalitarianism. is it acceptable to you for society at large to pay for borderline retards to breed and raise children?
|
|
|
Post by clinthall on Mar 7, 2007 19:41:32 GMT -5
If it meant I didn't have to put up with facist morons, I'd take that trade any day of the week.
So: what are you and your white supremacist militia planning to blow up next?
|
|
|
Post by clinthall on Mar 7, 2007 19:41:56 GMT -5
err, fascist.
|
|
|
Post by zoomixer on Mar 7, 2007 20:35:53 GMT -5
The Klan? Those sheet-wearing, Pabst swilling inbreds? Geez, give me more credit than that! They couldn't pronounce the word "eugenics". Totalitarian ambitions? In some ways, I guess, but just long enough to take a surgeon's scalpel to this sick society and cut out some tumors. Regarding totalitarianism. is it acceptable to you for society at large to pay for borderline retards to breed and raise children?
|
|
|
Post by outcast on Mar 7, 2007 22:17:13 GMT -5
The problem I see with licensing to be a parent is this, there would be some peeps that would get off doing it illegal ;D
|
|
|
Post by solinvictus on Mar 7, 2007 22:18:16 GMT -5
If it meant I didn't have to put up with facist morons, I'd take that trade any day of the week. So: what are you and your white supremacist militia planning to blow up next? Where do you get white supremacist? Race hasn't been discussed until you brought it up. Fascist? Honestly, probably yes.
|
|
|
Post by zoomixer on Mar 7, 2007 22:37:37 GMT -5
Where do you get white supremacist? Race hasn't been discussed until you brought it up. Fascist? Honestly, probably yes.
|
|
|
Post by solinvictus on Mar 7, 2007 22:47:10 GMT -5
Where do you get white supremacist? Race hasn't been discussed until you brought it up. Fascist? Honestly, probably yes. Zyklon Bee? Pretty good one for Somethingawful.
|
|
|
Post by clinthall on Mar 7, 2007 23:35:38 GMT -5
Sol: read your posts elsewhere. You appear to ooze with resentment toward anyone with skin darker than a manila envelope. Hence, I called you a "white supremacist."
So, a self-avowed fascist? You support eugenics and forced sterilization? Gosh, I'd love to hear what else is on your brown-shirt laundry list.
Odds are you've made special plans for the Jews, too.
|
|
|
Post by zoomixer on Mar 8, 2007 1:24:15 GMT -5
Zyklon Bee? Pretty good one for Somethingawful. Hey! Which one are you?
|
|
|
Post by Dale Jackson on Mar 8, 2007 7:32:53 GMT -5
Since these photos are funny, here is Dino Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by espy on Mar 8, 2007 10:15:23 GMT -5
Dale! I'm all for the funny pics but that is blasphemy.......uncool bro.
|
|
|
Post by zoomixer on Mar 8, 2007 10:46:41 GMT -5
I must say I prefer Dino Jesus over White, Blue-Eyed Jesus. Of course, I'm sure that solinvictus prefers White, Blue-Eyed Jesus. Maybe he thinks he is the White, Blue-Eyed Jesus come to save us all from the evil that can come from melanin. Solinvictus, you've made the mistake of pissing of Mr. T.
|
|
|
Post by espy on Mar 8, 2007 10:52:23 GMT -5
Jesus was a jew and was most likely dark complected, dark hair and brown eyes. And I dont think he had long hair because it is written that long hair is a cover for women but a shame on men.
|
|
|
Post by Dale Jackson on Mar 8, 2007 11:14:56 GMT -5
Can any of us actually say jesus did not have a dinosaur head? Or maybe a pet dinosaur?
|
|
|
Post by espy on Mar 8, 2007 11:25:59 GMT -5
Maybe a pet dinosaur, but dude, depicting our saviour with a reptile head is like I said blasphemous.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hobbs on Mar 8, 2007 11:45:49 GMT -5
Or...it could just be a joke. At least Buddy Jesus has a sense of humor.
|
|