| Author | Topic: Global Warming Redux (Read 3,111 times) |
kevin Cog in the Machine
    member is offline
Joined: Apr 2007 Gender: Male  Posts: 492 Location: LA
|  | Re: Global Warming Redux « Reply #420 on May 31, 2007, 7:13am » | |
Sure do...saw it on a movie the other day. Haven't experienced any personally lately though. Its so strange -- flooding elsewhere and drout here. Weird the way weather works.
Wasn't Korea accused of tampering with the weather somehow?
| “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” -- Calvin & Hobbes |
|
W.O.M.I Super Cog in the Machine
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/4188/gwbsaves2on7.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2007 Gender: Male  Posts: 1,160 Location: Birmingham
|  | Re: Global Warming Redux « Reply #421 on Jun 1, 2007, 5:42pm » | |
Twista-
I didn't mean to give the impression that Luntz had anything to do with any of the focus groups. If that was the impression I left, then I phrased myself poorly.
That said, it is very possible that Luntz- who is a Republican pollster- might have convinced the Bush Administration to use the term 'climate change' rather than 'global warming', purpose unknown.
| Let every nation know, whether it wishes us we]l or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.- John F. Kennedy- Inaguration Speech- January 20th, 1961 |
|
Twista Guest
|  | Re: Global Warming Redux « Reply #422 on Jun 2, 2007, 12:19am » | |
Quote:Twista-
I didn't mean to give the impression that Luntz had anything to do with any of the focus groups. If that was the impression I left, then I phrased myself poorly. |
|
I just have doubts that the Democrats would want to go with climate change rather than global warming. One would think that global warming has a more sinister and powerful sound, when picking descriptors for a political conflict... (Not that the Dems would ask my opinion... LOL)
Quote: That said, it is very possible that Luntz- who is a Republican pollster- might have convinced the Bush Administration to use the term 'climate change' rather than 'global warming', purpose unknown. |
|
It's possible that climate change could be more accurate, considering for example, that warming could cause rising sea levels which may interrupt or change the flow of the gulf stream. This could result in cooling for northwestern Europe, while other areas of the world would be hotter.
Or then again it could be the political angle. I tend to think that has a bit of validity, when comparing the wording of the present "climate change" page with the archived "global warming" page on the EPA site.
| |
|
W.O.M.I Super Cog in the Machine
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/4188/gwbsaves2on7.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2007 Gender: Male  Posts: 1,160 Location: Birmingham
|  | Re: Global Warming Redux « Reply #423 on Jun 2, 2007, 12:52pm » | |
twista-
"Climate Change" is a much more accurate and therefore valid term to use than "global warming" and for the very reasons I've mentioned before:
It is virtually impossible to 'disprove' climate change because ther fact is that the climate does indeed change over great periods oftime (dramatically) and even over shorters spans (incrementally).
The task yet to be completed is to prove how much of an effect man's activities have on the process- if any- and what man can do to slow, stop or reverse the process- if any.
| Let every nation know, whether it wishes us we]l or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.- John F. Kennedy- Inaguration Speech- January 20th, 1961 |
|
Twista Guest
|  | Re: Global Warming Redux « Reply #424 on Jun 4, 2007, 2:46am » | |
"It is virtually impossible to 'disprove' climate change because ther fact is that the climate does indeed change over great periods oftime (dramatically) and even over shorters spans (incrementally)."
And it's especially hard to prove when them dam republicans keep moving the goal posts about what climate change is...
Just feeding their "business pig" friends and lining their own pockets, while ruining the world! Neocon!!!! (Because we all know that all the problems of the world are because of Republicans, and their shills, anyway...) Shill!!!! Heh heh, Gotcha last buddy! LOL
(I wonder if anyone will jump in here and "get me last" after I go off to bed... LOL) Good night and goodbye all!!!
| |
| |
|